loganom
Yes, that is a fair point.

With wikipedia there is less for us to maintain, though it is harder for us to determine what story to return.
With History.com, as you pointed out, the format of the source could change more frequently. However, we do not need an effective heuristic for returning stories. They list only ~20.

I haven't been here very long. What do you all think is the most favorable choice?

@chaitanyanettem
@zac
@yegg
posted by loganom Community Leader4 years and 6 months ago Link

chaitanyanettem
I think for a start yegg's suggestion is workable. I can get that functionality done in little time.

If someone could clarify whether this should in fact be longhead and not spice then I will go ahead and get the necessary functionality up.
posted by chaitanyanettem 4 years and 6 months ago Link